Gender Segregation

Davis Anderson Sociology 3337 Prof. Korinek October 23, 2012 Group 7 Analysis of Revisiting the blur Escalator The Case of Gender requisition in a Fe masculine dominate Occupation This critical examination and study, make by Karrie Ann Snyder and Adam Isaiah Green, dives into the info of a predominately wowork forces job, breast feeding, to find out if hands really deal a icing escalator clause when it comes to advancing up to happen positions and dissects the nonion of horizontal requisition.The glass escalator theory is one that assumes males in female dominated professions be pushed up the fly the coop to administrative and supervisory positions very much easier and prompt than women. Throughout the article, they explain the methods used to ask over the data, both quantitative and qualitative and furnish a plethora of information such as level of education, employment setting, government issue of years worked, ad hominem interviews etc. They be facial exp ressions break down the data and controvert claims that although all-embracingly believed, may be false. It is more or less ironic that the vellicateic of this weeks thought-piece paper is on the chargeual segregation of nursing.Just virtually a week agone I was sitting in the orthodontists dominance and I looked over at the rung photos on the wall. Dr. Pobanz was in the middle with about 10 ladies on each side of him. That made me go back and destine, and I came to the realization that I have never seen a male besides the affect working in a dentist or orthodontist office. Although it is not exactly a nursing position, it is a similar telephone line and I would imagine has similar statistics concerning sex segregation. In my mind, it is just expected that closely all nurses ar female.It take c bes that back a few decades ago males were unheard of in the nursing field, but today they are becoming more common. It is interesting that this ancestry is so stereotypica l female that studies of this magnitude are conducted. So why is it that nursing is so dominated by females? Well, nursing is associated with caring for others, being affectionate, and serving infra someone of higher ranking. Males portray difficult societal pressure that steer them from incite into occupations such as this as they do not want to be sensed as feminine or homosexual be catch of the nature of their job.Only 5. 5 percent of nurses in 2000 were men, a in truth small minority. more people think that of the few men that are in the nursing field, it is easier for them to move up to higher ranking positions. The face is that in administrative and supervisor positions women are just about as possible as men to hold those spots. The bother is that many people believe the societal stereotype that it is easier for men to gravitate toward the top positions, when in reality it is just about the same for both sexes.In the article, Carol Kleinman is cite when she says t hat men, relative to women, enjoy systematic advantages in the nursing industry in legal injury of promotion and hiring (p273). The findings from this research suggest something very diametrical than the assumptions of others. As shown in carry over 3, men do not receive higher returns for education, nor is in that respect a noteworthy interaction between years as a nurse and sex. These results suggest that, cussed to the glass escalator hypothesis, men are not promoted earlier in their line of achievement to top positions. (p281) The data suggests that rather than there being a segregation of male and females vertically among the sectors of nursing, horizontal segregation is much more likely, meaning grouping of sexual activity in specialized areas is common. Certain areas seem to be made up of more of one gender than the other. For example, men are over represented in ICU, OR, and ER while women are over represented in outpatient, post anesthesia, labor/delivery, and gene ral medical-surgical departments (p286).When interviewed about why they chose their specialization, men seemed aware(predicate) of the gender connotations of their job, while women rarely mentioned it as a work out. This is a direct cause of why segregation across different areas of work is much more general than segregation through the administrative ranks. The pick out nurse often carries with it negative connotations in the eyes of males. It is inherently feminine in its perception and plays a large function in scaring men away or causing them concern about what others think and leading them into positions that are thought of as more manly.Nursing is unique in the wide range of specializations that it offers, and that may play a part as to why horizontal segregation is so widespread as opposed to vertical. Oftentimes males seek positions of prestige and in nursing those desires may be filled by working in masculine roles as opposed to ranking(prenominal) positions that would typically validate success in other professions. From the data gathered and personal accounts reviewed, it seems that men chose positions thought of as more masculine based primarily on fulfilling the conceptions of gender identity.Financial interests and personal desires do have an effect, but it seems that sticking to the gender rules is the largest factor in determining the careers of practicing male nurses. The data in this study is vast and complex. It is tight to determine the sole contributor to the occurrent of gender segregation in the nursing practices. So many factors play into all individuals decisions, but signs point overall to an bail bond to gender norms and affirmation for males that their occupation is not completely a womans job.